SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

LALA DAGADU KALE – Appellant
Versus
THE ADDITIONAL COMMISSIONER NASHIK AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['N V GAWARE', 'COPY SERVED ON GP', '', 'G P', 'GARUD N C']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO.3953 OF 2009

Lala Dagadu Kale,

age years, occ. Agri,

R/o Paritwadi, Tq. Karjat,

Dist. Ahmednagar.

PETITIONER

V E R S U S

1-

The Additional Commissioner, Nashik

Division, Nashik .

2-

The Aditional Collector, Ahmednagar,

District Ahmednagar.

3-

The Sub-Divisional Officer, Karjat,

Taluka Karjat, Dist. Ahmednagar.

4-

The Tahsildar, Karjat,

Taluka Karjat, Dist. Ahmednagar.

5-

Sukhdeo s/o Shankar Kale,

age years, Occ. Agri,

R/o Paritwadi, Tq. Karjat,

Dist. Ahmednagar.

RESPONDENTS.

---

Mr. N.V. Gaware, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr. Ghatge Ld. AGP for 1 to 4.

Mr. N.C. Garud, advocate for the respondent No.5.

---

CORAM : S. B. DESHMUKH, J.

DATE : 10th MARCH, 2010.

ORAL JUDGMENT :-

1.

Heard learned counsel for the parties.

2.

Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard finally with the consent of

the parties.

2

3.

Petitioner challenges the judgment and order passed by the

learned Additional Commissioner, Nashik Division Nashik in revision RTS

application No.194/2008 passed on December 31, 2008.

4.

The present writ petitioner was the petitioner before the learned

Additional C

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top