SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

UMARKHAN MAJIDKHAN PATHAN AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ORS – Respondent


Advocates:
['VIVEK DHAGE', 'M A KULKARNI', '', 'R/ TO', 'AND SERVED']

1

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

WRIT PETITION NO. 2047 OF 1994

1]

Umarkhan S/o Majidkhan Pathan,

Age 30 years, Occu. Service,

R/o Neknoor, Dist. Beed.

2]

Alkananda d/o Maroti Munde,

Age 24 years, Occu. Nil,

r/o at post Therla, Tq. Patoda,

Dist. Beed.

.. PETITIONERS.

VERSUS

1]

The State of Maharashtra

through Government Pleader

High Court of Judicature

of Bombay Bench at

Aurangabad.

2]

The Collector, Beed

Taluka & Dist. Beed.

3]

The Education Officer (Primary)

Zilla Parishad, Beed.

4]

The Beed Zilla Parishad, Beed

through its Chief Executive

Officer.

5]

The Director of Education,

Maharashtra State, Pune. ..RESPONDENTS

...

Mr. D.A. Karnik , Advocate for Petitioners.

Shri K.G. Patil, A.G.P. for respondent No. 1, 2 &

5.

Smt. M.A. Kulkarni, Advocate for respondent No. 4

CORAM :- B.R.GAVAI AND

S.V. GANGAPURWALA JJ.

DATE : 9th MAY, 2010.

ORAL JUDGEMENT:

2

By way of present petition, the

petitioners are seeking regularization of their

appointments as Primary Assistant Teacher. The

petitioners were appointed as Primary Assistant

Teacher vide order 05/11/1988 and 14/03/1989

respectively.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top