SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
POPAT PANDHARINATH KALE – Appellant
Versus
ADDITIONAL COLLECTOR AND COMPETENT AUTHORITY AND ORS – Respondent


- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION

WRIT PETITION NO.1241 OF 2008

...

Popat Pandharinath Kale ...Petitioner

v/s.

Additional Collector and Competent

Authority, Nashik and others ...Respondents

...

Mr.R.D.Soni i/b Ram & Co. for the Petitioner.

Mr.A.H.Palekar, AGP for the State.

...

CORAM: D.K.DESHMUKH &

J.P.DEVADHAR, JJ.

DATED: 26TH AUGUST, 2008

P.C.:

Rule. Returnable forthwith. Heard finally by

consent of parties.

2. Admittedly the land of the Petitioner was

declared surplus under the Urban Land Ceiling and

Regulation Act. Notification under sub-section 3 of

Section 10 of that Act was issued and it was

published in th

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top