BOMBAY HIGH COURT - APPELLATE SIDE,BOMBAY
JAMA MASJID TRUST THROUGH ITS TRUSTEES – Appellant
Versus
SPL.LAND ACQ.OFFICER,METRO CENTRE NO.1,PANVEL – Respondent
CAF 4104/2009
1
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE
AT BOMBAY
CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION
CIVIL APPLICATION NO.4104 OF 2009
IN
FIRST APPEAL NO.951 OF 1991
Jama Masjid Trust thru its
’
......
Applicants
its trustees Ibrahim Patel
& Ors.
Vs.
State & Ors.
......
Respondents
Mr. D.S. Sawant, Advocate for Applicants.
Mr. A.R. Patil, AGP for State
CORAM : Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota, J.
Date : 26th March, 2010
P.C. :
1.
This Civil Application is taken out for recalling the order dated
28th November 2006 and for restoration of the First Appeal No.951 of
1991 after condoning delay in filing the application. The learned AGP
submits that the Civil Application as filed is not maintenable.
2.
The order which is sought to be recalled records death of
appellants no. 2 and 3 and takes note that no steps were taken by
appellant no.1 or his Advocate to bring the heirs and legal
representatives of appellants no.2 and 3 on record. The order also
states that looking to the nature of the order impugned in the appeal,
2
the appeal abates in its entirety. The appeal therefore was dismissed
as such.
3.
Mr.Sawant, the learned counsel for the applicants submits that
the order is not correct in recording that appellant no.1 was required to
bring the heirs and legal representatives of deceased appellants nos. 2
and 3 on record. He points out that the appeal was by a trust filed
through its trustees. Appellants no. 2 and 3 being the trustees, there
was no question of bringing their heirs on record. The appellant no.1
was required to bring on record the trustees appointed in place of
appellants no. 2 and 3. If according to the applicant, there is error in
the order apparent on record, the needs to take recourse to the
appropriate remedy of filing an application for review. The applicants
could also have challenged the order in the higher court. However, civil
application for recalling of such an order is not maintenable. In that
circumstance, the Civil Application is dismissed.
3.
In view of dismissal of the Civil Application NO.4104 of 2009, the
Civil Application NO.4105 of 2009 does not survive, the same is
accordingly dismissed.
(Smt. R.P. SondurBaldota,J.)
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.