Prasad Anil Mahamine vs The State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J
Prasad Anil Mahamine – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs. Sunita G. Sonawane
For the Respondents: Mr. K. S. Patil, Mr. P. S. Dighe

Table of Content
1. allegations of rape and extortion against the applicant. (Para 2 , 4)
2. defense argues allegations arose from financial disputes. (Para 5 , 9)
3. court considers absence of evidence and delays in trial. (Para 7 , 12)
4. bail granted with conditions based on judicial discretion. (Para 11 , 13)

ORDER:-

1. By this application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , the applicant seeks regular bail in Crime No.2095 of 2020 registered with Shrirampur (City) Police Station, Dist. Ahmed- nagar for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 376 (2) (n), 376 (D) 385, 386, 420, 323, 120(B), 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The investigation was set in motion on the information given by the victim. In nutshell she alleged that the applicant/accused is conversant with her since school days. In the year 2014, she had mar- ried, but there was matrimonial discord in the year 2016. The accused developed contact with her under pretext that he can arrange for a job with help of his contacts in Pune. In August 2018, the informant went to Pune for interview as informed by the applicant/accused. She was re- ceived by the accused/applicant. After interview, when

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BENCH AT AURANGABADS. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, JPrasad Anil Mahamine – AppellantVersusThe State of Maharashtra – Respondent

BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J
Prasad Anil Mahamine – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent