SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BENCH AT AURANGABAD
S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J
Prasad Anil Mahamine – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mrs. Sunita G. Sonawane
For the Respondents: Mr. K. S. Patil, Mr. P. S. Dighe

ORDER:-

1. By this application filed under Section 439 of the Code of Criminal Procedure , the applicant seeks regular bail in Crime No.2095 of 2020 registered with Shrirampur (City) Police Station, Dist. Ahmed- nagar for the offences punishable under Sections 376, 376 (2) (n), 376 (D) 385, 386, 420, 323, 120(B), 506 r/w 34 of the Indian Penal Code.

2. The investigation was set in motion on the information given by the victim. In nutshell she alleged that the applicant/accused is conversant with her since school days. In the year 2014, she had mar- ried, but there was matrimonial discord in the year 2016. The accused developed contact with her under pretext that he can arrange for a job with help of his contacts in Pune. In August 2018, the informant went to Pune for interview as informed by the applicant/accused. She was re- ceived by the accused/applicant. After interview, when she was feeling unwell, she was given tablets and advised to take rest. The informant alleged to loss her consciousness. Later on, she realized that she has been raped by the accused/applicant. However, the applicant threat-ened her under the pretext that he has recorded video.

3. It is further alleged that i

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top