- 1 -

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.15512 OF 2019

Ajinath S/o Raosaheb Raut

Petitioner

Versus

Geeta w/o Ajinath Raut

Respondent

Mr. Shaikh Asraf Patel, Advocate for the petitioner.

CORAM : Ravindra V.Ghuge, J.

DATE : 19^th December, 2019.

PER COURT :

1.

The petitioner-husband is aggrieved by the order dated

01.07.2019 passed by the learned Family Court, Ahmednagar, vide

which, application Exhibit-5 fled by the wife seeking interim

maintenance in Petition A No. 211/2018, has been partly allowed and

the petitioner is directed to pay Rs. 10,000/- per month to the

respondent-wife as maintenance.

2.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner has strenuously

criticised the impugned order. He submits that the wife conducts

tuition classes and thus, she can feed herself. The petitioner is a

- 2 -

primary teacher in a school. His salary is Rs. 40,000/- per month.

It is, therefore, submitted that the impugned order deserves to be

modifed.

3.

After considering the submissions of the learned

Advocate for the petitioner, I have gone through the judgment

delivered by the Hon’ble Apex Court in the matte