SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Appellant
Versus
MURLIDHAR MANSARAM SAPKALE and OTHERS – Respondent


Advocates:
['PUBLIC PROSECUTOR', 'JADHAV SATEJ S', '', 'FOR R NO TO']

wp 677 2018 j.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

CRIMINAL WRIT PETITION NO. 677 OF 2018

The State of Maharashtra,

Through : Police Inspector,

Jamner Police Station, Dist.

Jalgaon.

...

Petitioner.

VERSUS.

1)

Murlidhar Mansaram Sapkale,

Age 65 years.

2)

Shantaram Murlidhar Sapkale,

Age 38 years,

3)

Ravindra Murlidhar Sapkale,

Age 32 years.

4)

Anil Shankar Shelke, Age 37

years.

5)

Gajanan Damu Malkhede,

Age 32 years.

6)

Sau. Shantabai Murlidhar Sapkale,

Age 65 years.

All r/o. Maldabhadi, Tq. Jamner,

District Jalgaon.

...

Respondents.

...

Mr. S. D. Ghayal, APP for petitioner.

Mr. Satej S. Jadhav, Advocate for respondents.

CORAM

: MANGESH S. PATIL, J.

RESEREVED ON

: 12th February 2019.

PRONOUNCED ON

: 20th February 2019.

JUDGMENT :

Heard.

1/7

wp 677 2018 j.odt

2.

Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. The learned

advocate Mr. Jadhav waives service of notice on behalf of the

respondents. At the request of both the sides the matter is

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top