M/s. Galaxy Enterprises vs State of Maharashtra

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
G.S. Kulkarni, J
M/s. Galaxy Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent

Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. P.K. Dhakephalkar, Mr. Karan Bhosale, Mr. Vipul Singh
For the Respondents: Mr. Samdhani, Mr. Shrihari Aney, Mr. Yogesh Sankpal, Mr. Makrand Kale, Mr. Mukesh Vashi, Mr. Girish Utangale, Mr. Chetan Mhatre, Mr. Sujay Prabhu

Table of Content
1. concern over slum rehabilitation schemes. (Para 1 , 2 , 3)
2. challenge to sra order regarding redevelopment. (Para 4 , 5)
3. petitioner's detailed account of the dispute. (Para 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11)
4. petitioner's appeal against ceo sra's decision. (Para 31 , 32)
5. court’s analysis on delays in redevelopment. (Para 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55)

Judgment:

Prelude:-

1. This is yet another proceeding concerning a ‘Slum Rehabilitation Scheme’ on Government land, wherein the slum dwellers since the year 1997 have nurtured an unfulfilled dream to be rehabilitated in a permanent roof over their head and live in human conditions.

2. Before adverting to the case in hand, I may at the outset express concern on such issues which inhibit and hamper the Slum Redevelopment Schemes.

3. There is a wealth of decisions of the Supreme Court and this Court emphasizing on the expeditious and effective rehabilitation of slum dwellers, who live in inhuman conditions, so as to achieve in letter and spirit, the object and intention of a fairly old State legislation namely the "Maharashtra Slum Areas (Improvement , Clearance and Redevelopment) Act 1971". Nonetheless, considerin

Click Here to Read the rest of this document

BOMBAY HIGH COURTG.S. Kulkarni, JM/s. Galaxy Enterprises – AppellantVersusState of Maharashtra – Respondent

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
G.S. Kulkarni, J
M/s. Galaxy Enterprises – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent