1

913-wp-4065-17.odt

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO. 4065 OF 2017

ORIENT CEMENT LIMITED

VERSUS

RAMESH DHANNU BAVISKAR AND ANOTHER

...

Advocate for Petitioner : Shri S. R. Patil

Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2 : Shri P. B. Salunke

…

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE, J.

DATED : 24^th JULY, 2018.

...

ORAL ORDER :

1.

The petitioner is aggrieved by the order dated

12/04/2016 delivered by the Industrial Court, Jalgaon, by

which, complaint (ULP) No. 107/2015 filed by the petitioner-

establishment, has been held to be untenable under the MRTU

and PULP Act, 1971 for the reason that the appropriate

government for a controlled industry ( cement ) is not the

State Government.

2.

The learned Advocate for the petitioner has strenuously

criticized the impugned order and has drawn my attention to

the nine grounds formulated by him in the memo of the

petition. It is submitted that different unfair Labour Practices

2

913-wp-4065-17.odt

(ULP) have been defined in the Schedule II, III