SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
SANT KABIR SHIKSHAN PRASARAK MANDAL THR. ITS PRESIDENT – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANOTHER – Respondent


1

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

APPELLATE SIDE, BENCH AT AURANGABAD

WRIT PETITION NO.3813 OF 2014

WITH

WRIT PETITION NO.3814 OF 2014

WRIT PETITION NO.3816 OF 2014

Office Notes, Office

Memoranda of Coram,

appearances, Court's

orders or directions

and

Registrar's

orders.

Court's or Judge's orders

Mr.S.S.Kazi, advocate for the petitioner.

Mr.S.K.Kadam, Asstt.Govt.Pleader for the State.

CORAM : S.V.GANGAPURWALA &

V.K.JADHAV, JJ.

Date : 15.12.2014.

PER COURT :

1.

Heard.

2.

Mr.Kazi, learned counsel submits that proposals were

submitted seeking approval to the appointment of Clerk/Teacher in

the petitioner institution. The said proposal seeking approval to the

appointment of the Clerk/Teacher has been rejected by the

Education officer only on the ground that as per Government

Resolution dated 2.5.2012, the approval can not be granted to the

Teachers on grant-in-aid post. The learned counsel submits that

Government Resolution dated 2.5.2012 can not be applied to the

2

minority institution as has been held by this Court in a case of

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top