SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ARUN SHRIRAM BANKAR – Appellant
Versus
SHANTARAM SHANKARRAO SURADAKAR – Respondent


Advocates:
['GANGAKHEDKAR SHAILENDRA S', 'COPY SERVED ON PP', '', 'R/SOLE SERVED', 'PALODKAR DEVDATT P']

-:(1):-

986

FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY

BENCH AT AURANGABAD.

APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION

Office

Notes,

Office

Memoranda

of

Coram,

appearance, Court's orders or

directions and Registrar's

orders.

Court's or Judge's orders.

CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 986 OF 2012

ARUN SHRIRAM BANKAR

VERSUS

SHANTARAM SHANKARRAO SURADAKAR

...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S.

Advocate for Respondent: Mr. D.P.Palodkar.

APP for Respondent (in Criminal Appeal) : Mr. A.V.

Deshmukh.

***

CORAM: V. K. JADHAV, J.

DATED:

27th AUGUST, 2014.

ORAL ORDER:

1

Heard learned counsel Mr. S.S. Gangakhedkar for

the Applicant/ original complainant and Mr. D.P.Palodkar,

appearing for the Respondent/sole-original accused.

2.

By way of the present application, the applicant is

seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and

order dated 19th January, 2012 passed 15th Judicial

Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad in S.C.C. No.2027 of

2007 thereby dismissing the complaint and acquitting

the accused for the offence punishable under section

138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.

-:(2):-

986

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top