BOMBAY HIGH COURT - BENCH AT AURANGABAD
ARUN SHRIRAM BANKAR – Appellant
Versus
SHANTARAM SHANKARRAO SURADAKAR – Respondent
-:(1):-
986
FARAD CONTINUATION SHEET NO.
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
BENCH AT AURANGABAD.
APPELLATE SIDE JURISDICTION
Office
Notes,
Office
Memoranda
of
Coram,
appearance, Court's orders or
directions and Registrar's
orders.
Court's or Judge's orders.
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 986 OF 2012
ARUN SHRIRAM BANKAR
VERSUS
SHANTARAM SHANKARRAO SURADAKAR
...
Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Gangakhedkar Shailendra S.
Advocate for Respondent: Mr. D.P.Palodkar.
APP for Respondent (in Criminal Appeal) : Mr. A.V.
Deshmukh.
***
CORAM: V. K. JADHAV, J.
DATED:
27th AUGUST, 2014.
ORAL ORDER:
1
Heard learned counsel Mr. S.S. Gangakhedkar for
the Applicant/ original complainant and Mr. D.P.Palodkar,
appearing for the Respondent/sole-original accused.
2.
By way of the present application, the applicant is
seeking leave to file appeal against the judgment and
order dated 19th January, 2012 passed 15th Judicial
Magistrate, First Class, Aurangabad in S.C.C. No.2027 of
2007 thereby dismissing the complaint and acquitting
the accused for the offence punishable under section
138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act.
-:(2):-
986
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.