Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
FIRDOSH P. POONIWALLA, J
Devendra Ramchandra Palsamkar – Appellant
Versus
Gajanan Raghunath Patkar – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. plaintiffs co-owners of property (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. suit property assessed for non-agricultural taxes (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 3. defendant no.1's claims of ownership (Para 8) |
| 4. plaintiffs' possession not established (Para 9 , 10 , 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32) |
| 5. court's ruling on possession (Para 33 , 34) |
| 6. first appeal dismissed (Para 35) |
Judgement:
1. This First Appeal is filed by the Original Defendant No.1 challenging the Judgement dated 1st October 2012, passed by the Bombay City Civil Court at Dindoshi, decreeing Suit No.1341 of 2010.
2. In the present Judgement, the parties are described in the same manner as they were described in the Suit.
3. Suit No.1341 of 2010 was filed seeking the following relief:
“a) That this Hon'ble Court be pleased to restrain the defendant No.1 his servants, agents, contractor/s or any person or persons claiming through under or by him permanently by an order and injunction of this Hon'ble Court from entering into, remaining upon, dispossessing the Plaintiffs and/or disturbing the peaceful possession of the plaintiffs on the suit property and/or constructing
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
