SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 10

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Bharati Dangre, J
Kishor Gangadhar Patil – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Writ Petition No.14991 of 2021 | Writ Petition No.14993 of 2021 | Writ Petition No.14998 of 2021



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr A. B. Kale
For the Respondents: Mr P. G. Borade, Mr S. K. Kadam, Mr R. R. Karpe

The court upheld the election officer's rejection of candidates' nominations based on amended bye-laws, determining the requirements for reserved categories were valid and adhered to proper legal processes.

Headnote:(A) Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 - Sections 73

(B) and 73

(C) - Elections to Managing Committee - Petitioners were rejected to contest elections as they did not meet qualifications set forth in amended bye-laws for reserved constituencies - Amendment to bye-laws followed due process - Court upholds rejection based on qualifications established under bye-laws. (Paras 11-13)

(B) Qualification - Bye-laws - Requirement for candidates from reserved categories to bring sugarcane for crushing in certain seasons deemed valid - Reservation provisions mandatory and must be observed in conjunction with bye-laws. (Paras 10-12)

Facts of the case:
Petitioners challenged the rejection of their nominations for failing to meet the qualifications set by amended bye-laws relating to the elections of the Cooperative Society's Managing Committee.

Findings of Court:
The election officer’s decision to reject the petitioners’ nominations was upheld as legally sound, affirming that they were not qualified under the amended bye-laws.

Issues: Determining the legality of the bye-law amendments and their applicability to the petitioners’ nominations.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found that although the petitioners asserted the reservation laws, they failed to meet qualifications specified in the amended bye-laws, which were validly applied.

Result: Writ petitions dismissed.

Table of Content
1. overview of the petitions' context regarding elections. (Para 1 , 2)
2. details on nomination papers and disqualification. (Para 3 , 4)
3. arguments focusing on the validity of bye-laws and qualifications. (Para 5 , 6 , 7)
4. court's application of regulation and legality. (Para 8 , 9 , 10)
5. final determination and ruling dismissing petitions. (Para 11 , 12 , 13)

JUDGMENT :

1. The three writ petitions revolve around the elections to the Managing Committee of Ashok Nagar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana, Tq. Shrirampur, Dist. Ahmednagar and since the petitions raise a common challenge to the impugned orders, the learned Counsel are permitted to advance their arguments collectively and the three writ petitions are heard and disposed of by a common judgment.

Since the parties have expressed their consensus to argue the writ petitions finally at the stage of admission, issue Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith.

I have heard the learned Counsel Shri. Ajit Kale for the petitioners in all the three writ petitions, learned Counsel Shri. S. K. Kadam for the respondent Nos.2 to 4, learned Counsel Shri. R. R. Karpe for the respondent No.5 - Karkhana and learned A.G.P. for State of Maharashtra.

2. The last election to the the Managing Committee of the respondent No.5 - Ashok Nagar Sahakari Sakhar Karkhana (hereinafter referred to as “Karkhana”) for the term 2015-16 to 2019-20 was held in the year 2015 and on the expiry of it's term of 5 years, the elections were due, however, on account of the Covid-19 pandemic, they could not be held in time, though the term of the Managing Committee expired on 05/03/2020. On account of the wide spread of the pandemic, the State Government had took a decision to postpone the elections of all the Co-operative Societies in the State by issuing an order on 18/03/2020, by invoking the provisions of the Epidemic Diseases Act 1897, however, there was no extension granted to the term of the Managing Committee.

A writ petition came to be filed in the High Court, by some of the members seeking appointment of an Administrator, in light of expiry of the term of the Managing Committee. An interim order came to be passed in the aforesaid writ petitions on 24/08/2021, which restrained the Managing Committee to take any major policy decision and the said order was assailed before the Hon’ble Apex Court. During pendency of the said proceedings, amendment was introduced in Section 73 AAA of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act , 1960 (hereinafter referred to as ‘the MCS Act’), thereby inserting a proviso, extending the term of the Managing Committee. Resultantly, the term of the Managing Committee of respondent No.5 – Karkhana, was extended from 2019-20 upto 2020-2022.

The elections to the Managing Committee of the Karkhana which postponed in the wake of the decision of the State Government, were declared on 09/12/2021, when the election programme was published by the State Election Authority, Pune, Maharashtra i.e respondent No.2. The election programme so published, staggered the process of the election and stipulated the date for filing of nomination papers for the Constituency slated to be from 13/12/2021 to 17/12/2021. 20/12/2021 was fixed as the date for scrutiny of nomination papers by the Election Officer. The list of the validly nominated candidates was scheduled to be displayed on 27/12/2021 and the period for withdrawal of the nomination papers was prescribed as between 21/12/2021 to 04/01/2022. 05/01/2022 is the date scheduled for publication of list of validly nominated candidates and (6)

for allotment of symbols to the candidates. The voting day is specified as 16/01/2022 with the result being declared on 17/01/2022.

In the election programme so published, from 21/12/2021 to 04/01/2022, the stage of objections being raised to the candidature or to the rejection of the nomination papers was slated.

3. The three petitioners, in the three writ petitions are agriculturists by profession and are members

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top