BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Urmila Joshi-Phalke, J
Vijay Gopalkrushna Patil, Santosh Nilkantha Chintanwar, Sanjay Gopalrao Chintanwar, Gangareddy Vitthal Godhanwar, Moreshwar Hanumatrao Zilpilwar, Namdeo Suryabhan Jiddewar, Anup Dipak Patil, Rajeshwar Jalpatrao Yenmaneniwar, Vinod Vishambar Chamediya, Bhagwantrao Hanumantrao Nainwar – Appellant
Versus
The Joint Charity Commissioner, Amravati Region, Amravati – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. appellants contest the rejection of trustee applications. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. appellants' claims to trust membership are disputed. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. arguments centered on procedural errors in trustee appointments. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 4. court stresses validity of public consultation and inquiries. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 18 , 19) |
| 5. court remits the case for a proper inquiry under the act. (Para 20 , 21) |
1. This appeal is preferred by the appellants feeling aggrieved by the order passed by the Joint Charity Commissioner, Amravati on an application under Section 47 of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act, 1950 filed by the appellants.
2. The facts giving rise to this appeal are as follows :
The Anand Club Pandharkawada is a public trust duly registered under the provisions of the Maharashtra Public Trusts Act and also under the Societies Registration Act. The said Trust had been formed with the object of promotion and encouragement of all indoor and outdoor games, tournaments and exhibition matches.
3. As per the contention of the appellants the original record including the resolution which was passed for inducting the present proposed trustees as members of the s
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.