Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
G. A. SANAP, J
Maheshkumar Hargovind Goyal – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. rule set for handling proceedings. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. details on criminal case and accusations. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. petitioner's arguments against further investigation. (Para 6 , 8) |
| 4. respondent's assertions on investigation necessity. (Para 9 , 10) |
| 5. judicial observations regarding investigation procedures. (Para 11 , 15 , 19) |
| 6. final decision on the validity of the lower court's ruling. (Para 12 , 14 , 16 , 17 , 20) |
1. RULE. Rule made returnable forthwith. Heard finally by consent of the learned advocates for the parties.
2. In this petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, challenge is to the order dated 07.06.2022, passed below Exh.80 by learned Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Court no.10, Nagpur, whereby learned Magistrate was pleased to grant permission to the Investigating Officer to conduct further investigation and file supplementary charge-sheet against the petitioner under Section 173 sub-Section (8) of the Code of Criminal Procedure (hereinafter referred to as “the Cr.P.C.” for short).
3. The facts giving rise to this petition are as follows :
The petitioner is accused no.7 in a crime bearing No. 343/2016, registered at
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
