Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
R. D. DHANUKA, M.M. SATHAYE, JJ
Gangadhar Karbhari Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
Union of India – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. introduction to land acquisition context (Para 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 2. arguments regarding fair compensation act applicability (Para 11 , 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 3. opposition's legal arguments and interpretations (Para 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34) |
| 4. court’s observations on constitutional issues (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38 , 39 , 40 , 41 , 43 , 44 , 45) |
| 5. analysis of statutory provisions and precedents (Para 46 , 47 , 48 , 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53 , 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58 , 59 , 60 , 61 , 62 , 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72 , 73) |
| 6. conclusions about case law applicability (Para 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81) |
JUDGMENT:
1. Rule. Mr. Shimpi waives service for Respondent No.1. Mr. Khandeparkar waives service for Respondent No.2. Dr. Sathe learned senior counsel waives service for Respondent No.3 in WP No. 7115 of 2022. Rule is made returnable forthwith. By consent of the parties, the matter is taken up for final hearing.
2. By this Writ Petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioner seeks a Writ of Certiorari for quashing and setting aside the impug
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
