SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 7173

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE K.R. SHRIRAMHON'BLE JUSTICE DR. NEELA KEDAR GOKHALE
AL JAMIA MOHAMMEDIYAH EDUCATION SOCIETY – Appellant
Versus
COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX (EXEMPTIONS)- MUMBAI – Respondent


2024:BHC-OS:6536-DB Digitally s Si Hgn Ae Md B b Hy AVI 1/6 430-oswp-1689-2024.doc SHAMBHAVI NILESH NILESH SHIVGAN SHIVGAN Date:

2024.04.23

13 :44:13 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY +0530 ORDINARY ORIGINAL CIVIL JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.1689 OF 2024 Al Jamia Mohammediyah Education Society 6/8A Hazarat Terrace Annexe, Sankli Street, Byculla, Mumbai 400 008.

…Petitioner PAN NO.AAATA5693D Versus

1. Commissioner Of Income Tax (Exemptions)

Mumbai,Room No.601, 6th Floor, Cumballa Hill, MTNL Building, Peddar Road, Dr. Gopalrao Deshmukh Marg, Mumbai-400 026

2.

Union of India, Through the Secretary, Ministry of Finance, North Block, …Respondents New Delhi-110 001.

Mr. Sham V. Walve, with Mr. Tanzil Padvekar and Ms. Tejal Kharkar, for Petitioner.

Mr. Dinesh Gulabani, with Mr. Prathmesh Bhosle, for Respondent-

Revenue.

CORAM: K. R. SHRIRAM &

DR. NEELA GOKHALE, JJ.

DATED: 15th APRIL 2024 ORAL JUDGMENT:- (Per K.R.Shriram, J.)

1. Rule. By consent, rule made returnable forthwith.

2. Petitioner, a charitable trust, which is registered under the Bombay Public Trusts Act, 1950 filed its return of income (“ROI”) for Assessment Year (“AY”) 2016-17 on 6th September 2016 declaring income at ‘Nil” and cl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top