SHRI. NITIN SURESH KADAM AND ORS vs SHRI. VITTHAL THAKU JADGALE AND ORS

Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation

Table of Content
1. overview of parties and tenure history (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4 , 5 , 6 , 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12)
2. petitioners argue against eviction orders and justify their claims. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16 , 18 , 19 , 20 , 21 , 22 , 23)
3. analysis of the relevance of personal cultivation in tenancy law. (Para 24 , 25 , 26 , 27 , 28 , 29 , 30 , 31 , 32 , 33 , 34)
4. justifications for the regulation of ownership under section 32r. (Para 35 , 36 , 37 , 38)
5. criteria for valid eviction under section 32r. (Para 39 , 40 , 41 , 42 , 43 , 44 , 45 , 46 , 47 , 48)
6. conditions under which non-cultivation leads to eviction. (Para 49 , 50 , 51 , 52 , 53)
7. procedural fairness in eviction proceedings. (Para 54 , 55 , 56 , 57 , 58)
8. examination of the tenant's statement's legal implications. (Para 59 , 60 , 61 , 62)
9. delay and procedural correctness in tenancy appeals. (Para 63 , 64 , 65 , 66 , 67 , 68 , 69 , 70 , 71 , 72)
10. conclusion of the judgment and orders. (Para 73 , 74 , 75 , 76 , 77 , 78 , 79 , 80 , 81 , 82 , 83 , 84 , 85 , 86 , 87 , 88 , 89 , 90)

JUDGMENT:

1. These petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution impugns the order dated 21st February 1975 passed by the concerned