SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 8052

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MANISH PITALE, J
Arunkumar Devnath Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
Anticipatory Bail Application No. 2564 of 2024



Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Aabad Ponda, Mr. Abid Mulani, Mr. Ashish Malani Agarkar, Ms. Harshada Panphani, Mr. Chinmay Patil
For the Respondents: Mr. Shishir Hiray, Mr. Sanjay Kokane

The court confirmed prima facie evidence of forgery and conspiracy involving the replacement of blood samples, justifying the denial of anticipatory bail.

Headnote:(A) Indian Penal Code, 1860 - Sections 201, 304, 338, 337, 427, 279, 120-B, 201, 213, 214, 466, 467, 468, 471, and 109 - Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 - Sections 7, 7-A, 8, 12, 13 - Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 - Sections 184, 185, 3(1) 180, 5(1) 171, 119-A and 199/177 - Anticipatory bail application - Applicant accused of replacing blood samples to evade responsibility in a fatal accident - Applicant argued insufficient evidence for applying Section 467 IPC, which deals with forgery of valuable securities - The court ruled there is a prima facie case against the applicant, indicating deception practiced upon the Assistant Chemical Analyzer, supporting the applicability of Sections 464 and 467 IPC. (Paras 1, 15, 26)

(B) Anticipatory Bail - Court must consider whether a prima facie case is made out, particularly for serious offenses like Section 467 IPC. (Paras 25, 26)

Facts of the case:
The applicant is linked to a fatal accident involving a Porsche driven by a minor, where the applicant's son replaced blood samples to shield the driver from liability.

Findings of Court:
The evidence suggests strong complicity in a conspiracy and the seriousness of the allegations warrants dismissal of bail.

Issues: Whether the applicant can claim innocence under Section 201 IPC considering the evidence of forgery in the blood sample incident.

Ratio Decidendi: The court found sufficient prima facie evidence of deception and conspiracy, necessitating investigation; thus bail was denied.

Result: Application dismissed.

Table of Content
1. details of the applicant's alleged involvement in the negligent act leading to the accident. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6)
2. arguments regarding the sufficiency of proof for charges under ipc. (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 12)
3. court's rationale for assessing the seriousness of the fraud committed by replacing blood samples. (Para 9 , 10 , 15 , 16 , 23 , 25)
4. interpretation of the legal definitions of forgery and deception in the context of this case. (Para 18 , 22 , 26)
5. the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed. (Para 27)

ORDER :

1. This Court heard arguments in the present application on 27.09.2024 and closed the same for orders. The learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant as well as the learned Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) appearing for the respondent – State, both requested for time till 09.10.2024 for placing written notes of arguments and supporting judgments on record, as a question of law arose in the matter. Accordingly, the parties were granted time and they did place on record written notes of arguments alongwith copies of supporting judgments.

2. On 27.09.2024, this Court recorded a statement made by the learned SPP, on instructions of the ACP, Crime-1, Pune City, present in Court on that day, that till the decision in the present application, no coercive action would be taken against the applicant.

3. The applicant in the present application is one of the accused persons concerning First Information Report (FIR) No.0306 of 2024, dated 19.05.2024, registered at Police Station Yerawada, District Pune, for offences under Sections 304 , 338, 337, 427, 279, 120-B, 201, 213, 214, 466, 467, 468, 471 and 109 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 ( IPC ) and Section 7 , 7-A, 8, 12 and 13 of the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 and Section 184 , 185, 3(1) 180, 5(1) 171, 119-A and 199/177 of Motor Vehicle Act, 1988 .

4. The FIR was registered at the behest of informant Aquib Mulla. He stated that when he and his friends were returning home after a party and they reached near landmark society at Kalyani Nagar, Airport road, Pune, a Porsche car, which did not have registration plates, being driven in an extremely rash and negligent manner, under drunken condition by a child in conflict of law hit a Bajaj Pulsar Motorcycle from the backside, thereby causing the death of the victims, who were riding the motorcycle. The occupants of the said car included the minor son of the applicant, who was said to be sitting in the rear seat of the Porsche car and who was himself alleged to be in a drunken condition.

5. The investigation was conducted by the ACP and upon completion of investigation charge-sheet was filed, with the case being registered as Special Case (ACB) No. 917 of 2024. It was alleged that the parents of the child in conflict with law, who was driving the Porsche car, indulged in illegal conduct by bribing the doctors of the hospital where the blood samples of the occupants of the car were collected for analysis. According to the investigating authority, one of the doctors i.e. Dr. Halnor at the Sassoon General Hospital, Pune, accepted illegal gratification of ₹ 3 Lakhs from the parents of the child in conflict with law, who was driving the Porsche car, in order to take the blood sample of the mother of the said child in conflict with the law and to show the same as being that of the child in conflict with law, further forwarding it for analysis. This was done with the connivance of another doctor named Dr. Taware and other persons, all of whom have been arraigned as accused persons.

6. Similarly, the allegation against the applicant is that he replaced the blood sample of his minor son in connivance with the aforesaid doctors and staff, as also the co-accused parents of the child in conflict with law, who was driving the Porsche car, with the blood sample of co-accused Ashish Mittal and such replaced blood sample was sent for analysis. According to the investigating authority, the appl

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top