Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MANISH PITALE, J
Arunkumar Devnath Singh – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. details of the applicant's alleged involvement in the negligent act leading to the accident. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 2. arguments regarding the sufficiency of proof for charges under ipc. (Para 7 , 8 , 11 , 12) |
| 3. court's rationale for assessing the seriousness of the fraud committed by replacing blood samples. (Para 9 , 10 , 15 , 16 , 23 , 25) |
| 4. interpretation of the legal definitions of forgery and deception in the context of this case. (Para 18 , 22 , 26) |
| 5. the application for anticipatory bail is dismissed. (Para 27) |
ORDER :
1. This Court heard arguments in the present application on 27.09.2024 and closed the same for orders. The learned senior counsel appearing for the applicant as well as the learned Special Public Prosecutor (SPP) appearing for the respondent – State, both requested for time till 09.10.2024 for placing written notes of arguments and supporting judgments on record, as a question of law arose in the matter. Accordingly, the parties were granted time and they did place on record written notes of arguments alongwith copies of supporting judgments.
2. On 27.09.2024, this Court recorded a statement made by the learned SPP, on instructions of the ACP, Cr
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
