SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2024 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 8180

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
ARUNKUMAR UDAYRAJ SINGH – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


2024:BHC-AS:46063 Ajay IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL REVISION APPLICATION NO. 422 OF 2002 Arunkumar Udayraj Singh Applicant .. (Orig. Accused)

Versus The State of Maharashtra and Anr. .. Respondents ....................

 Mr. Rajesh L. Dharap, Advocate for Applicant appointed through Legal Aid.

 Ms. Manisha R. Tidke, APP for Respondents – State.

 Mr. Rahul Patil, PSI, Shivaji Park Police Station present.

...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J. DATE : NOVEMBER 25, 2024.

ORAL JUDGMENT:

1. Heard Mr. Dharap, learned Advocate for Applicant appointed through the Legal Aid Committee and Ms. Tidke, learned APP for Respondents – State.

2. Present Criminal Revision Application (for short “CRA”) takes exception to concurrent judgments passed by the learned Trial Court and Appellate Court convicting Revision Applicant for offences punishable under Sections 279, 337, 338 and 304A of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (for short “IPC”). Applicant is convicted and sentenced to suffer rigorous imprisonment for one year and fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default to suffer simple imprisonment for six months for offence punishable under Section 304 IPC, suffer

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top