SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1738

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
NEELAM RAJENDRA NANAWARE – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


Digitally signed by ARUNA ARUNA SANDEEP SANDEEP TALWALKAR Cr.APPEAL350.2025.odt TALWALKAR Date:

2025.05.03

12:35:32 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 350 OF 2025 Smt. Neelam Rajendra Nanaware.

Age : 58 yrs..

R/at Flat No. A/302-303, New Kalparaj Apartment, Vallipir Road, Opp. Zozwala Petrol Pump, Bailbazar, Kalyan, Thane 421301. … Appellant.

Versus The State of Maharashtra.

(Through EOW Mumbai). … Respondent.

****

Mr. Chaitanya Pendse, Advocate for the Appellant.

Mr. Vinod S. Chate, APP for Respondent/State.

****

CORAM : RAVINDRA V. GHUGE AND ASHWIN D. BHOBE, JJ.

RESERVED ON : 25th APRIL, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 2nd MAY, 2025.

JUDGMENT : (PER ASHWIN D. BHOBE, J)

1. Heard Mr. Chaitanya Pendse, Advocate for the Appellant and Mr. Vinod S. Chate, learned APP for the Respondent State.

2. Admit. By consent of parties matter taken up for final hearing.

3. By the present appeal filed under Section 11 of the Maharashtra Protection of Interest of Depositors (In Financial Establishment ) Act, 1999 (for short “MPID Act”), Appellant assails the order dated 20.03.2025 (for short “impugned order”), passed by the Designated Court under MPID Act, City

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top