HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
SANDEEP V. MARNE, J
Appasaheb Pandurang Yadav (Deceased) Through his legal heir / representative – Appellant
Versus
Appasaheb Virupaksh Tandale – Respondent
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. With the consent of the learned Counsel for parties, Petition is taken up for hearing.
2. Petitioners challenge the Judgment and Order dated 12/11/2021 passed by the Maharashtra Revenue Tribunal (‘MRT’), Camp Kolhapur, allowing the Revision Application filed by Respondent No.1 and setting aside the order dated 23/11/2020 passed by the Sub-Divisional Officer (‘SDO’) condoning the delay in filing Tenancy Appeal No.71/2020. The MRT has rejected the application for condonation of delay filed by the Petitioners in Tenancy Appeal No.71/2020. That Tenancy Appeal was filed by the Petitioners challenging the order dated 28/05/2018 passed by the Agricultural Lands Tribunal-cum-Tehsildar (‘ALT’), Panhala.
3. Facts of the case are that Petitioners and Respondent Nos. 2 to 5 are tenants in respect of the land admeasuring 57 R of Gat No.103 and 4 Hector 10 R of Gat No.175 situated at Village Waloli, Tal. Panhala, Dist. Kolhapur. Respondent No.1 is the landlord in respect of that land.
4. Respondent No.1 filed Tenancy Case No.30/1985 under section 43B of The Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 (‘Tenancy Act’) before the Tehsildar
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.