SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 1791

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J
Ram Shankar Sinha – Appellant
Versus
Ritesh V. Patel – Respondent


Advocates:
For the Appellants/Petitioners: Mr. Alizain Patel
For the Respondents: Mr. Nilesh L. Makwana, Lajri H. Panchal

JUDGMENT:

1.Heard Mr. Patel, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Mr. Makwana, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondents.

2.By the present Civil Writ Petition filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenge is to the legality and validity of the order dated 14th February 2025 passed by Additional Divisional Commissioner, Konkan Division, Mumbai in Revision Application No.747/2024. By the impugned order of the Additional Divisional Commissioner, order dated 9th August 2024 passed by the Competent Authority, Rent Control Act Court, Konkan Division, Mumbai in Eviction Application No.247 of 2023 is set aside and the said Eviction Application is remanded back to the Competent Authority for trial and directing that order be passed after leading evidence by both the parties.

3. The Competent Authority by order dated 9th August 2024 rejected Application bearing Exhibit-11 filed in Eviction Application No.247 of 2023 seeking leave to defend filed by the Respondent and also Application bearing Exhibit-12 under Order VII Rule 11 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (“CPC”) for rejection of the Eviction Application. Consequently the Competent Authority passe

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top