SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 2580

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
NARBAHADUR KALESINGH DAMAI @ RAMSING – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR. – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION INTERIM APPLICATION NO. 1024 OF 2021 IN CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.34 OF 2021 Narbahadur Kalesingh Damai @ Ramsing …Applicant/

Appellant Versus State of Maharashtra & Anr. …Respondents Ms. Anjali Patil, Advocate for the Applicant/Appellant.

Mr. S. H. Yadav, APP for the Respondent No.1 – State. Ms. Manisha Deokar, Advocate for Respondent No.2.

CORAM : PRAKASH D. NAIK, J.

DATE : 11th JANUARY, 2022 PER COURT :

1. This is an application for suspension of sentence and grant of bail during the pendency of Criminal Appeal No.34 of 2021 preferred by the applicant challenging the judgment and order dated 24th November, 2020 passed by the learned Special Judge under the POCSO Act, convicting the applicant for offence under Section 376(2)(i)of Indian Penal Code (for short “IPC”) and Section 8 of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 (for short ‘POCSO Act’).

2. The case of the prosecution is that the victim is Digitally signed by SAJAKALI S LIA YJ AA KK AA TLI L JAIY MA AK DA AT R Sajakali Jamadar

1 of 7 JAMADAR Date:

2022.01.12

15:02:38 +0530 minor girl aged about 12 years at the time of of incident. On 6th July, 201

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top