SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 2913

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
RAJKUMAR SHARMA AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND ANR – Respondent


P.C. :-

1. Heard Mr. Santosh Gupta, learned Advocate for the Applicant and Ms. Rashmi S. Tendulkar, learned APP for the Respondent-State.

2. By the present Application, filed under Section 482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 (for short " BNS S "), Applicant Nos. 1 & 2, aged 68 years and 67 years, respectively, seek grant of interim protection (transit and pre- arrest bail) so as to enable the Applicants to travel to the State of Haryana, wherein FIR bearing No. 92/2025 dated 13.03.2025 is registered with the Ambala Cantt Police Station, for the offences punishable under Section 316 (2), 318(4), 351(2) and 61 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (for short “ BNS ”).

3. Applicants claim that they are not involved in the alleged offence. According to them, the allegations in the crime are against their son. Applicants state that they are law abiding citizens and they want to travel to the State of Haryana and apply for pre-arest bail and seek appropriate remedy before the Hon’ble Court, having territorial jurisdiction. They apprehend that they may be arrested in the said FIR bearing No. 92/2025 registered in the State of Haryana, while travelling to the State of Haryana.

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top