Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
VALMIKI MENEZES, J
MRS. LAKSHMI ANIL SALGAOCAR – Appellant
Versus
MRS CHANDANA ANIL SALGAOCAR – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identification of parties and context of the case. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of the estate and initial legal actions taken. (Para 3 , 4 , 5 , 6) |
| 3. details on the procedural history and conflicting applications filed. (Para 7 , 8 , 9 , 10 , 11 , 12) |
| 4. fundamental principles of succession and relevant laws considered. (Para 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 5. court's interpretation of universal succession and applicable laws. (Para 17 , 18 , 19 , 20) |
| 6. assessment of powers of the inventory court and application of law. (Para 21 , 22 , 23 , 24 , 25 , 26) |
| 7. conclusion on the maintenance of review applications and powers of the court. (Para 27 , 28 , 29) |
| 8. final decision issued by the court with directions for proceedings. (Para 30 , 31) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Heard learned counsel for the respective parties. By consent of all the parties to the above appeals/cross objections, all these appeals/cross objections are disposed of by this common judgment, at the stage of admission. he above appeals/cross objection arise from an Order dated 03.07.2018, Order dated 26.02.2019 and from an Order dated 03.02.2024 passed in Inventory Proceeding No.78/2016/B before the Court of the Civil Judge, Senior Divi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
