SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE MILIND N. JADHAV
T. A. N. MOORTHY – Appellant
Versus
C. K. NARAYAN AND ANR – Respondent


2025:BHC-AS:10 H.H. Sawant IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 561 OF 2018 T.A.N.Moorthy Appellant .. (Original Complainant)

Versus C.K.Narayan and Anr Respondents ..

....................

 Mr. Vijay Kurle a/w. Ms. Priyal Gupta and Mr. Pratik Sarkar, Advocates for Appellant.

 Mr. Vishal V. Kale a/w. Mr. Ganesh M. Misal, and Mr. Sunil S. Dude, Advocates for Respondent No.1.

 Ms. Sangita E. Phad, APP for Respondent No.2 – State ...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JANUARY 02, 2025 JUDGMENT :

1. Heard Mr. Kurle, learned Advocate for Appellant, Mr. Kale learned Advocate for Respondent No.1 and Ms. Phad, learned APP for State.

2. The present Appeal challenges judgment of acquittal dated 01.10.2015 passed by the Metropolitan Magistrate Court, 27th Court, Mulund in CC No. 274/SS/1996. Appellant – T.A.N. Moorthy is original Complainant, private Respondent No.1 Mr. C.K. Narayan is original Accused and State is Respondent No.2.

3. Parties shall be referred to as “Complainant” (Appellant)

and “Accused” (Respondent No.1) for convenience.

4. Prior to passing of impugned judgment dated 01.10.2015, Trial Court by judgment dated 08.03

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top