SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3261

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
NARAYAN PANDURANG UDAGE AND ANOTHER – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA AND OTHERS – Respondent


2025:BHC-AUG:12430 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD

12 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 3705 OF 2025 IN RAST/9150/2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5039/2020 WITH REVIEW APPLICATION STAMP NO.9150 OF 2025 IN WRIT PETITION NO.5039 OF 2020 Narayan Pandurang Udage And Another VERSUS The State Of Maharashtra And Others ...

Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Yogesh C. Patil AGP for Respondents: Mr. V S Badakh Advocate for Respondents : Mr. C. V. Thombre ...

CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J.

Dated : April 28, 2025 ORDER :-

CA for Delay :-

1. Heard learned advocates appearing for the applicant in civil application no.3705 of 2025.

2. For the reasons as stated in the application, application is allowed and disposed of.

Review application :-

1. Heard learned advocate appearing for the applicants. The applicants seeks review of the order dated 23.7.2024 passed in writ petition no.5039/2020.

2. Learned advocate appearing for the applicants submits that order under review is passed in absence of the applicants/original respondent nos.5 and 6. He submits that, although, they had engaged an advocate to defend their case, he failed to cause appearance in the matter. Eventually, order under review is passed

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top