SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3476

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
JYOTI SUMIT YERUNKAR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


HARSHADA H. SAWANT (P.A.)

IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION BAIL APPLICATION NO.2257 OF 2024 Vimal Mohanlal Jain .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent WITH INTERIM APPLICATION NO.359 OF 2025 IN BAIL APPLICATION NO.2257 OF 2024 Jyoti Sumit Yerunkar .. Intervenor IN THE MATTER BETWEEN:

Vimal Mohanlal Jain .. Applicant Versus The State of Maharashtra .. Respondent ....................

 Mr. Aabad Ponda, Senior Advocate a/w. Mr. Kiran Jain, Ish Jain, Mr. Vinayak Siraskar, Mr. Mithilesh Mishra, Mr. Duj Jain and Mr.

Nayan Bhalekar, Advocates i/by Kiran Jain & Co. for Applicant.

 Mr. Mayur Sonavane, APP for Respondent - the State of Maharashtra.

 Mr. Santosh Musale, Advocate for Intervenor in Interim Application No.359 of 2025.

 PSI - N. N. Joshi, Chunabhatti Police Station.

...................

CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.

DATE : JANUARY 27, 2025 P.C . :

1. Heard Mr. Ponda, learned Senior Advocate for Applicant; Mr. Sonavane, learned APP for Respondent - the State of Maharashtra and Mr. Musale, learned Advocate for Intervenor in Interim Application No.359 of 2025. Perused the record.

2. The present Application is filed by Accused No.13 u

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top