BOMBAY HIGH COURT
KESHAV MARUTI TARE AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
2025:BHC-AS:21623 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 947/2025 KESHAV MARUTI TARE AND ANR ...APPLICANTS VS STATE OF MAHARASHTR AND ANR. ...RESPONDENTS …
Adv. Sumeet Bansode h/f Sadandand Bansode for the Applicants.
Adv. Amit A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent State.
…
CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.
DATED : MAY 8, 2025 P.C.:
1. In the present proceeding the matter was fully argued before me on 29 April 2025, so also on 5 May, 2025. On the request made by the advocate appearing of the applicants, in order to take instructions from their clients, a short accommodation was granted to the then advocate appearing for the applicants.
2. Today Mr. Sumeet Bansode holding for Sadandand Bansode, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted before me that he wants a short accommodation in the matter in order to file his vakalatnama as the earlier advocate would no more appear in this matter.
3. I permitted Mr. Sumeet Bansode appear on behalf of the applicants to make his submissions in the present proceedings.
4. This is an application filed by applicants for seeking interim protection in C.R.No.53/2025, registered at Bhiwandi Talu
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.