SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3554

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
KESHAV MARUTI TARE AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


2025:BHC-AS:21623 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 947/2025 KESHAV MARUTI TARE AND ANR ...APPLICANTS VS STATE OF MAHARASHTR AND ANR. ...RESPONDENTS …

Adv. Sumeet Bansode h/f Sadandand Bansode for the Applicants.

Adv. Amit A. Palkar, APP for the Respondent State.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

DATED : MAY 8, 2025 P.C.:

1. In the present proceeding the matter was fully argued before me on 29 April 2025, so also on 5 May, 2025. On the request made by the advocate appearing of the applicants, in order to take instructions from their clients, a short accommodation was granted to the then advocate appearing for the applicants.

2. Today Mr. Sumeet Bansode holding for Sadandand Bansode, learned counsel for the applicants has submitted before me that he wants a short accommodation in the matter in order to file his vakalatnama as the earlier advocate would no more appear in this matter.

3. I permitted Mr. Sumeet Bansode appear on behalf of the applicants to make his submissions in the present proceedings.

4. This is an application filed by applicants for seeking interim protection in C.R.No.53/2025, registered at Bhiwandi Talu

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top