SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
RAVINDRA BALIRAM DEOKAR – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent


IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Digitally signed KANCHAN by KANCHAN VINOD V MI AN YO ED KAR CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION MAYEKAR Date: 2025.05.08

20:08:23 +0530 ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION NO. 1163 OF 2025 RAVINDRA BALIRAM DEOKAR ….. APPLICANT VERSUS THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA & ANR ..RESPONDENTS Senior Advocate Sudeep Pasbola a/w. Adv. Divakar Rai, Adv. Aditya Rai, Adv. Nitin Rai, Adv. Saurabh Tamhankar, Adv. Vayukumar Tiwari i/b. Adv. Ramchandra Rane for the Applicant.

Ms. Supriya Kak, A.P.P. for the State.

Adv. Usha Andewar for the Respondent No.2.

API Yashwant Chavan, Bhoiwada Police Station.

CORAM : RAJESH S. PATIL, J.

RESERVED ON : 2nd MAY, 2025 PRONOUNCED ON : 8th MAY, 2025 ORDER :-

This application is filed for pre-arrest bail under Section

482 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023 in connection with Crime No. 98/2025 registered with Bhoiwada Police Station for the offences punishable under Sections 74, 75, and 79 of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023.

2. Based on the complaint filed, an FIR has been lodged against the present applicant. The applicant preferred an anticipatory bail application before the Sessions Court, which was rejected. Hence, the present pr

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top