SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2025 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3985

BOMBAY HIGH COURT
HIMANSHU RAMESHCHANDRA UPADHYAY – Appellant
Versus
RAMESHCHANDRA DAHYABHAI UPADHYAY (DECEASED) – Respondent
MPT 159 / 2025



Digitally signed by MULEY MULEY SHUBHAM SHUBHAM PRAVINRAO PRAVINRAO Date: 1 18-MPT-159-2025.doc

2025.05.02

18:54:19 +0530 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY TESTAMENTARY AND INTESTATE JURISDICTION MISCELLANEOUS PETITION NO. 159 OF 2025 Hemanshu Rameshchandra Upadhyay ...Petitioner Rameshchandra Dahyabhai Upadhyay ...Deceased -----------------

Mr. Ketan Joshi a/w Shraddha D. for the Petitioner.

-----------------

CORAM : ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.

DATE : 27TH MARCH, 2025 P.C.:-

1. The Petitioner seeks the grant of a Legal Heirship Certificate under the provisions of Section 2 of the Bombay Regulation VIII of 1827 in respect of one Rameshchandra Dahyabhai Upadhyay (‘the deceased’), who died at Mumbai on 18th September 2007. A copy of the death certificate is annexed to the Miscellaneous Petition. It is stated that despite due and diligent search, no Will of the deceased has been found. It is therefore assumed that the deceased died intestate.

2. The deceased left behind him surviving as his only heirs and next of kin according to Hindu Succession Act, 1956, the persons mentioned in the table in paragraph 4 of the Petition.

3. The reason for which the Legal Heirship Certificate is required is set out in paragraph 7 of the Miscellaneous Petition.

4. The other legal heirs of the deceased have filed consent affidavits, which are annexed to the Petition.

5. The Registry has duly verified the Petition. No other Petition for Legal Heirship Certificate, Succession Certificate, Probate or Letters of Administration with or without Will annexed has been filed. Therefore, there is no impediment in law to the grant of relief.

6. I have heard the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the Petitioner as well as perused the said Petition. I find that the same is in order and deserves to be allowed in the interest of justice.

7. The Miscellaneous Petition is therefore allowed in terms of prayer clause (a) which reads as under :-

“ a)That a Legal Heirship Certificate be issued under the provision of Bombay Regulation Act VIII of 1827, Certifying that Hemanshu Rameshchandra Upadhyay (son of the deceased) and all other Legal heirs in Para 4 are legal heir and Legal representative of the Deceased.”

8. The Registry shall issue the Legal Heirship Certificate in the standard format prescribed for the same, subject to all compliance of office requisitions.

9. The Miscellaneous Petition is accordingly disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs.

(ARIF S. DOCTOR, J.)

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top