SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3373

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE R. B. DEO
KALPANA VIJAYSINH SAVANT AND ANR – Appellant
Versus
BARKHA AMIR HALDIVE @ BARKHA GOVIND VALANJU AND ORS – Respondent


2022:BHC-AS:16279 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY Anand CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION 9970 OF 2019 Kalpana Vijaysinh Savant & anr. .Petitioners Vs.

Barkha Amir Haldive @ Barkha .Respondents Govind Valanju & ors.

Mr. Sandesh Patil i/b. Mr. Kiran Bhagat & Ms Divya Pawar, Advocate, for the Petitioners Mr. Chetan Patil, Advocate, for the Respondents CORAM : ROHIT B. DEO, J.

DATE : 14.07.2022 JUDGMENT . Heard.

2. Rule.

3. With consent, the Petition is fnally heard at the admission stage.

4. The Petitioners are the Plaintiffs in Special Civil Suit 17 of 2018 which is instituted seeking specifc performance of Agreement dated 16.02.2015, whereunder Defendants 1 & 2 – Respondents 1 & 2 herein, agreed to sell the suit property to the Plaintiffs, on terms and conditions stipulated therein. The suit property is described in the plaint, as land assigned Gat 49/1 admeasuring 5-22 R situated in Sawantwadi, District – Sindhudurg.

5. Respondent 1 is the Third Party, who preferred an application under O. I, Rule 10 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 ( for short ‘CPC’ ) seeking impleadment.

6. The learned trial Judge was pleased to allow the application preferred under O. I, Rule 10

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top