SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
Listen Audio Icon Pause Audio Icon
judgment-img

2022 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 3580

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE G. S. KULKARNIHON'BLE SHRI JUSTICE BHARAT PANDURANG DESHPANDE
RAMAN MADHOK AND 4 ORS – Appellant
Versus
STATE OF GOA THR. ITS CHIEF SECRETARY AND 3 ORS – Respondent
WP/25/2021



2022:BHC-GOA:1347-DB Jose IN THE HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY AT GOA WRIT PETITION NO.25 OF 2021

1. Mr. RAMAN MADHOK aged 75 years, residing at Plot No. 19, Aldeia de Goa, Bambolim – Goa.

2. Mr. NEVILLE CHICO, aged 56 years, residing at Plot No. 84, Aldeia de Goa, Bambolim – Goa.

3. Mr. AMIT PRADHAN, aged 65 years, residing at Plot No. 57, Aldeia de Goa, Bambolim – Goa.

4. Mr. JOSEPH NORONHA, aged 65 years, residing at Plot No. 11, Aldeia de Goa, Bambolim – Goa.

5. Mrs. MARIAM SANDHU, aged 68 years, residing at Plot No. 202, Aldeia de Goa, Bambolim – Goa. … Petitioners Versus

1. STATE OF GOA, through its Chief Secretary, having its office at Secretariat, Porvorim, Goa.

2. Dy. TOWN PLANNER, Town & Country Planning Department, Tiswadi Taluka Office, 05th Floor, Kamat Tower, Patto, Panaji – Goa.

3. VILLAGE PANCHAYAT CURCA, BAMBOLIM & TALAULIM, through its Secretary, Tiswadi – Goa.

4. GOAN REAL ESTATE & CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD., Aldeia de Goa, P.O. Goa University, Bambolim – Goa. ... Respondents Mr. Yogesh V. Nadkarni with Mr. Sanket Kamat, Advocates for the Petitioners.

Mr. Devidas Pangam, Advocate General with Ms. Maria Correia, Additional Government Advocate for the Respondent-State.

Mr. J.P. Supekar with Mr. Roger D'Souza and Ms. Sufiyan Sayed, Advocate for Respondent No.4.

G.S. KULKARNI &

CORAM:

BHARAT P. DESHPANDE, JJ.

RESERVED ON: 23rd September, 2022 PRONOUNCED ON: 30th September, 2022 JUDGMENT: (Per Bharat P. Deshpande, J.)

1. The moot question which arises for consideration in the present proceedings is as to whether the originally sanctioned open spaces on the basis of which plots are sold, whether can be altered under the garb that some area above the required percentage of 15% under the regulations was available.

2. Vide order dated 11.02.2021, notices were served on all the parties and it was made clear that the matter will be taken up for final disposal at the admission stage itself.

3. Rule. Rule returnable forthwith. Heard the parties by consent.

4. The Petitioners are the residents/plot owners of the project “Aldeia de Goa” at Bambolim of which Respondent No.4 is the developer.

5. In the present petition, the Petitioners are aggrieved by the permission/NOC dated 11.12.2020 granted by the Dy. Town Planner/Respondent No.2 herein to Respondent No.4 for deviation/alteration in the final approved sub-division layout of the said project thereby allowing total area of 9,384 sq. mts of the open space to be deleted from the earlier approved plan and to be used for commercial and/or residential purpose.

6. Petitioners Nos.1 to 4 purchased plots in the first phase of the said project as per the final approved plan of the year 2004. Petitioner No.5 purchased plot in the second phase as per the approved plan 2007. All the Petitioners constructed their respective houses as per the approved plans. 7. In the year 2010, the developer applied for amalgamation of Phase I and II by submitting fresh plans. The open spaces shown in 2004 plan and 2007 plan were maintained as it is. The concerned authorities approved amalgamation of Phase I and Phase II wherein open spaces in both the phases were shown as it is.

8. Suddenly in the year 2020, the developer applied for revision of plans. In the said revision, open spaces shown in the amalgamation plan of 2010 were reduced by an area of 9384 sq. mts. Specifically, the open space “A” admeasuring 1345 sq. mts. is deleted and included in a larger plot area for commercial activity. The entire open space “B” admeasuring 581 sq. mts. is deleted and converted into residential plot No.409. The open space “C” admeasuring 12710 sq. mts. has been reduced to 7052.5 sq. mts., as such, the area of 5657.5 sq. mts. has been included in the residential plots Nos.410, 411 and 412. The entire open space “D” of 1800 sq. mts. is deleted and included within a plot for commercial activities. The Petitioners along with 43 other plot owners objected by filing representations to the Planning and Development Authority and Town Planner for convers

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon Back to top