Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
R.N. Laddha, J
Dattatray Tatyaram Pondkule – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. nature of charges outlined in fir. (Para 1) |
| 2. incident of assault and nature of charges (Para 2) |
| 3. defense's claim of false implication and delay in fir (Para 3) |
| 4. opposition's emphasis on serious nature of allegations (Para 4 , 5) |
| 5. court's assessments of evidence and conduct (Para 6 , 7) |
Coram : R.N.Laddha, J.
Date : 23 June 2025.
P.C. :
This is an application for pre-arrest bail filed by the applicant, apprehending arrest in CR No.102 of 2025, registered at Bhigwan Police Station, Pune, for offences punishable under Sections 118 (2), 119(1), 115(2), 352, and 351(2) read with 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 (‘ BNS ’) and Sections 4 and 27 of the Arms Act, 1959 (‘Arms Act’).
2. The FIR pertains to the incident dated 3 April 2025, wherein it is alleged that the applicant, along with the co- accused, in furtherance of their common intention, abused and assaulted the first informant using a scythe, resulting in bleeding injuries.
3. The learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicant submits that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present crime. According to him, the offences punishable under Sections 118 (2) and 119 of the BNS and Sections
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
