Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
V.M. Deshpande, Amit B. Borkar, JJ
Dewanand Dattrao Bhoje – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. allegations and request for investigation (Para 2 , 3) |
| 2. request for disclosure of documents (Para 4) |
| 3. internal reports regarding permission for interception (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. court found no merit in the allegations (Para 7) |
DATE : SEPTEMBER 22, 2021 JUDGMENT : (Per : Amit B. Borkar, J.)
Heard. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.
2. By this Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, the petitioner, who is working as Stenographer in the Commissioner of Police, Amravati is seeking directions against the respondent No.9 – Police Station Officer, Police Station Gadge Nagar, Amravati to register crime and conduct enquiry of the complaint dated 18/06/2021 as respondents No.3 and 4 have violated right of privacy of the petitioner.
3. The petitioner on 18/06/2021, filed a complaint with respondent No. 9 – Police Station alleging that six officers, including the Superintendent of Police, Amravati (rural), the then Commissioner, State Intelligence Department, Mumbai, Steno Typist of Amravati (Gramin) police, Police Constable of Amravati Rural police and Office Superintendent of office of Superintendent of Police by collusion with each other and by misusing t
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
