BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Urmila Joshi-Phalke, J
Mukesh Vishnuji Anjankar – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. arguments for the appeal and implications of conviction. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 2. final order permitting bail. (Para 7) |
CORAM: URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
DATED : 30th JUNE, 2025
1. By this Application, the Applicant/Appellant seeking suspension of sentence and releasing him on bail during the pendency of the Appeal.
2. The Appellant has challenged the judgment and order of conviction passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati dated 13.05.2025 convicting the present Appellant for the offence punishable under Section 306 of IPC and sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 7 years and to pay fine of Rs.10,000/-, in default to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for six months. He is further convicted for the offence punishable under Section 498-A of IPC and sentenced to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for 3 years and to pay fine of Rs.5,000/-, in default to suffer Rigorous Imprisonment for six months.
3. Heard Mr. Mardikar, learned Senior Counsel for the Appellant, who submitted that the punishment imposed is of a limited period. He has also invited my attention towards the inquest panchnama and submitted that during the inquest panchnama, no chit was found alongwith the deceased
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.