Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
MANJUSHA DESHPANDE, J
Srinwati Mukherji – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. jurisdiction procedures initiated. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. petition for directions regarding shared household. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. details of domestic relationship and alleged abuse. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 4. impact of domestic violence on residential rights. (Para 8 , 9 , 10) |
| 5. employers and financial obligations stated. (Para 11 , 12) |
| 6. arguments on right to emi payments. (Para 13 , 19) |
| 7. broad interpretation of shared household. (Para 14 , 15 , 28) |
| 8. final determination on shared household's legal standing. (Para 35 , 36) |
JUDGMENT :
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith.
2. Writ Petition is taken up for final disposal with the consent of parties.
3. The Petitioner by this Petition is seeking directions to the Respondent No.2–husband to pay remaining two installments for the “Shared Household”, or such other amount as is payable to the developer towards the balance consideration in respect of a flat admeasuring 1029 square feet carpet area situated at Malad West, Mumbai. This prayer is made claiming to be under Section 2 (s) i.e. “Shared Household”, as defined under the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 (hereinafter referred to as, “the DV Act”, for brevity).
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
