Back
IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY
Not specified, J
Petitioner – Appellant
Versus
Respondent No.1/society – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. petitioner disputes redevelopment decision (Para 1 , 2 , 3) |
| 2. petitioner claims breaches of law in redevelopment agreement (Para 4) |
| 3. majority decisions are binding unless fraud is established (Para 5 , 6 , 7) |
| 4. writ petition dismissed with no costs (Para 8) |
1. The petitioner/a member of a cooperative housing society has filed dispute before the Cooperative Court under Section 91 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960 essentially challenging the decision of the general body of the said society deciding to redevelop the building owned by the society.
2. Respondent No.1/society has 28 members. The dispute is filed by a single member/petitioner. The petitioner has filed dispute seeking a relief that the decision to redevelop building belonging to the society and appointment of project consultant be declared as bad in law and in breach of directions dated 3 January 2009 issued by the Government of Maharashtra. Relief of permanent injunction restraining the society and appointed persons from carrying out work of redevelopment was also sought. In the said dispute, the petitioner filed an application for temporary injunction restraining the society and appoi
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
