Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
R.N. Laddha, J
Abhijit Suresh Jadhav – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. significant delay in fir registration suggests civil implications. (Para 2) |
| 2. court assesses the need for custodial interrogation and bail conditions. (Para 3) |
| 3. bail is granted with conditions regarding evidence tampering. (Para 5) |
Coram: R.N. Laddha, J.
Date: 28 July 2025 P.C.:
. Heard Mr Gaurav Sharma, the learned Counsel appearing on behalf of the applicants and the learned Additional Public Prosecutor representing the respondent / State.
2. By this application, the applicants seek pre-arrest bail in connection with C.R. No.896 of 2024, registered at Vile Parle Police Station, Mumbai, for the offences punishable under Sections 406 and 420 read with 34 of the Indian Penal Code .
3. At the outset, the learned APP, on instructions, apprises the Court that the investigation in the present matter has been concluded. He submits that there is no further necessity for any recovery or discovery from the applicants. The prosecution is in the process of filing the charge sheet before the competent Court. Additionally, the learned APP fairly concedes that, in compliance with the directions issued by this Court vide order dated 23 June 2025, the applicants have attended the c
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
