BOMBAY HIGH COURT
NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI, SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ
CHANDRAKANT RAOSAHEB TAMBE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
CRIMINAL APPLICATION NO. 1326 OF 2024 | CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 282 OF 2024
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. application for bail after a murder conviction. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. evidence and court's observation on conviction. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 3. court's ruling on the application for bail. (Para 6 , 7) |
CORAM : NITIN B. SURYAWANSHI AND SANDIPKUMAR C. MORE, JJ.
Dated : July 28, 2025 PER COURT :-
1. By this application, applicant / accused who is convicted under Section 302 of IPC, is seeking suspension of his substantive sentence of life imprisonment and his release on bail.
2. The applicant was charged alongwith 11 (Eleven) other accused for commission of murder of Bajirao Kalyanrao Tambe, on 26.05.2020. The prosecution alleged that the applicant assaulted deceased with knife and inflicted repeated blows on his stomach, due to which, he expired.
3. The Trial Court, after recording the evidence and considering the arguments, acquitted 11 accused and convicted the applicant / accused as aforesaid.
4. Heard learned Advocate for the applicant, learned APP for State and learned Advocate for respondent No. 2. Perused the record.
5. Evidence of two eye-witnesses is recorded by the Trial Court which is consistent on the point of assault by the applicant on the deceased. The deceased has suffered four stab wounds, three on the stomach and one on the right under-arm. The doctor has opined that the death due to excessive haemorrhage due to stab injury to vital organs i.e. liver, spleen, stomach and descending colon (large intestine). The murder weapon is recovered at the instance of applicant / accused and CA Report shows that blood of blood group ‘AB’, of the deceased was found on the said weapon.
6. Prima facie, we find sufficient material on record to sustain the conviction of the applicant / accused. The Trial Court has properly appreciated the evidence and has rightly convicted the applicant. No case is made out by the applicant for suspension of sentence.
7. The application, being devoid of merits, is rejected.
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.