Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
ARUN R. PEDNEKAR, J
SACHIN SURESH ALIAS APPASAHEB KALE – Appellant
Versus
THE STATE OF MAHARASHTRA – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. conditions to ensure compliance and safety (Para 1 , 4 , 6) |
| 2. possession of weapons without use leads to bail (Para 2 , 3) |
| 3. consideration of antecedents impacts bail decision (Para 5) |
| 4. court observations limited to bail application (Para 7) |
| 5. bail application disposed of (Para 8) |
CORAM : ARUN R. PEDNEKAR, J.
DATE : 28-07-2025 PER COURT:-
1. Heard the learned counsel for the applicants and the learned A.P.P. for the respondent-State.
2. The applicants are seeking bail as they are arrested on 05.06.2025 in connection with Crime No. 311/2025, dated 05.06.2025, registered with Bidkin Police Station, District Chhatrapati Sambhajinagar, for the offences punishable under Section 3 , 4, 25 of Arms Act , under Section 135 of the Maharashtra Police Act , 1951 and under Section 3 (5) of the B.N.S.
3. The learned counsel for the applicants submits that the applicants are arrested for having possession of country made pistol and sharp edge knife. The maximum punishment of the offence is of three years. Subsequently, section 7 of the Arms Act is added.
4. The learned APP submits that during course of investigation, section 7 of the Arms Act is added.
5. However, in the instant
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
