Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J
Manohar Lahanuji Rajurkar, Arun Ramanrao Rajurkar, Pukhraj Ramanrao Rajurkar, Yogeshwar Ramanrao Rajurkar, Kavita Raju Diware, Jyotsana Shrikant Dahake – Appellant
Versus
Rajendra Bhaurao Lokhande, Tushar Manohar Lokhande – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. land ownership and litigation context established. (Para 3 , 4 , 5) |
| 2. jurisdictional challenges to civil suit emphasized. (Para 7 , 10) |
| 3. court's interpretation of revenue code provisions articulated. (Para 8 , 9 , 11) |
| 4. final ruling set to allow civil revision application. (Para 12 , 13) |
CORAM :MRS. VRUSHALI V. JOSHI, J.
Judgment reserved on :11.07.2025 Judgment pronounced on:28.07.2025 JUDGMENT:-
1) Heard.
2) Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith. This Civil Revision Application is heard finally with the consent of the learned counsel appearing for the parties.
3) Being aggrieved against the order dated 01/08/2024 passed by the learned Joint Civil Judge, Senior Division, Nagpur, in Regular Civil Suit No.921/2023, the applicants in civil revision application are before this Court. Vide aforesaid order, the suit filed by the non-applicants- defendants before the Trial Court under Order VII Rule 11 C.P.C. was allowed.
4) The facts of the case as projected by the applicants are as follows:-
The applicants own and possess a land situated at Mauza:
Godhani (Railway), Ph No. 12, Nagpur Rural Nagpur, survey no.409/2 (old), 448/1 and 447/1 (new) Area 0.50 HR and 0.27 HR. A sale
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
