Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Urmila Joshi-Phalke, J
Shailesh s/o Kanhaiya Nagpure – Appellant
Versus
State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. requesting bail based on criminal charges and context. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. arguments for and against granting bail. (Para 3 , 4) |
| 3. court's consideration of evidence and circumstances. (Para 5) |
CORAM : URMILA JOSHI-PHALKE, J.
DATED : 28/07/2025
1. By this application, the applicant is seeking bail as he came to be arrested on 31.08.2024 in connection with Crime No.514/2024 registered with Police Station Kanhan, District Nagpur for the offences punishable under Sections 3 (5), 309(4), 310(1), 324(4)(5), 351(1)(2) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023 and under Sections 4 and 5 of the Arms Act .
2. The crime is registered on an allegation that he along with the other accused entered into the bar and restaurant owned by the informant and some of the accused have assaulted the informant by means of knife and snatched amount of Rs.1000/-
and also caused the loss to the articles of the bar to the tune of Rs.15,276/-.
3. Heard learned Counsel for the applicant, who submitted that as far as the present applicant is concerned, the allegation is that he was holding a knife and he has caused the injuries to the informant. The injuries sustained by the informant are simple in nature. No
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
