Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J
Amit Chandole – Appellant
Versus
Directorate of Enforcement – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. identifying reliefs sought in writ petitions. (Para 1 , 2) |
| 2. overview of allegations regarding financial misconduct. (Para 5) |
| 3. discussion on magistrate's duties regarding summary reports. (Para 7 , 8) |
| 4. outcome of writ petitions and remanding case for fresh consideration. (Para 16) |
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED: 11 JUNE 2025 JUDGMENT:
1. The reliefs sought in Criminal Writ Petition No.4523 of 2022 are as follows :-
“b. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside letters dated 7th September, 2022 (Exh. 43), 15th September, 2022 (Exh. 48) in Special Case No. 1124 of 2020, pending on the file of Ld. Special PMLA Judge.
Mumbai;
c. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside letter bearing OW No. 17951/2022 dated 4th August, 2022 from the Registrar of Sessions Court, Mumbai, directing the Ld. Additional Chief Metropolitan Magistrates 47th Court at Esplanade, Mumbai, to pass appropriate orders with regards to the ‘C’-Summary Report, and thereafter commit the same to the Ld. Special PMLA Court, Mumbai;
d. That this Hon’ble Court be pleased to quash and set aside the judgement and order dated 14/09/2022 passed by the Ld. Additional Chief Metropo
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
