Back
HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
Ravindra V. Ghuge, Gautam A. Ankhad, JJ
Mr.Ajit Kisan More – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. the court's jurisdiction under writ for illegal arrest seeks to uphold fundamental rights. (Para 1 , 10) |
| 2. dispute over the ownership and sale of a bull led to a fatal incident. (Para 5 , 6) |
| 3. failure to document grounds of arrest in writing violates constitutional rights. (Para 11 , 23 , 24) |
ORAL JUDGMENT
1. Rule. Rule made returnable forthwith and heard finally with the consent of the parties.
“A) That after examining the facts, circumstance, material in the chargesheet and remand orders passed by the Ld. JMFC at Baramati Dist. Pune, this Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue writ of habeas corpus or any other appropriate writ or direction under Article 226 of the Constitution of India and section 482 of Criminal Procedure Code 1973 ( 528 of BNSS), thereby declaring the arrest of the Petitioner illegal in Crime No. 283 of 2024, registered with Wadgaon- Nimbalkar Police Station, Dist. Pune for the offences punishable under section 307, 143, 147, 352, 504, 506, 201 of Indian Penal Code r/w. Section 3,25,29 of Arms Act.
C) This Hon’ble Court may be pleased to issue appropriate direction to release the Petitioner forthwith by declaring the arrest illegal in FIR No. 283
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
