Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
MILIND N. JADHAV, J
Directorate of Enforcement through its Dilip Kumar Assistant Director – Appellant
Versus
Rakesh Brijlal Jain and Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. discussion on the extension of stay application and delay in filing. (Para 1 , 2 , 3 , 4) |
| 2. court's authority regarding finality of judgments and functus officio doctrine. (Para 5) |
| 3. conclusion on dismissal of the application. (Para 6) |
CORAM : MILIND N. JADHAV, J.
DATE : FEBRUARY 27, 2025 P. C . :
1. Heard Mr. Shirsat, learned Advocate for Applicant and Mr.
Setalvad, learned Advocate for Respondent Nos. 1 and 2.
2. By the present Application Applicant seeks extension of stay of the Judgment dated 21.01.2025 which was granted by this Court. After the said judgment was pronounced as per paragraph No.46 of the said judgment Mr. Shirsat appearing for Respondent No.3-ED would submit that some time was lost in obtaining the approval and sanctions as there was some degree of consultation as to whether Special Leave Petition challenging the said judgment be filed in the Supreme Court , but ultimately it was filed on 18.02.2025 and ED procured Diary No.9134 of 2025. In that view of the matter the present Application was moved before this Court. Prima facie it is seen that present application was filed on 18.02.2025 but it was under objections. Incidentally, 18.02.2025 is the
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
