SupremeToday Landscape Ad
Back
Next
Judicial Analysis Court Copy Headnote Facts Arguments Court observation
judgment-img

2018 Supreme(Online)(Bom) 951

HIGH COURT OF BOMBAY
HON'BLE SMT. JUSTICE DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI
PRAMILA BALASAHEB BHINTADE AND ORS. – Appellant
Versus
ANUSAYA SARJERAO GUJAR AND ORS. – Respondent


2018:BHC-AS:956 Dixit IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT BOMBAY CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION WRIT PETITION NO.11550 OF 2017 Pramila Balasaheb Bhintade & Ors. .… Petitioners V/s.

Anusaya Sarjerao Gujar & Ors. …. Respondents Mr. Dhananjayrao D. Rananaware for the Petitioners.

Mr. Vijay D. Patil for the Respondents.

CORAM : DR. SHALINI PHANSALKAR-JOSHI, J.

RESERVED ON : 9 TH JANUARY 2018 .

PRONOUNCED ON : 11 TH JANUARY 2018 .

JUDGMENT :

1. Rule. Rule is made returnable forthwith. Heard finally, at the stage of admission itself, by consent of Mr. Rananaware, learned counsel for the Petitioners, and Mr. Patil, learned counsel for the Respondents.

2. By this Petition, filed under Article 227 of the Constitution of India, the Petitioners are challenging the order dated 4th October 2017 passed by the District Judge-3, Satara, thereby allowing the Miscellaneous Civil Appeal No.96 of 2017, which Appeal was preferred by the Respondents herein challenging the order dated 6th May 2017 passed by the 7th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Satara, below “Exhibit-5” in Regular Civil Suit No.480 of 2014.

3. The Petitioners herein are the Original Plaintiffs, who had filed the Suit for declaration that, they

Click Here to Read the rest of this document
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
SupremeToday Portrait Ad
supreme today icon
logo-black

An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers

Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance

qr

Scan Me!

India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!

For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :

whatsapp-icon telegram-icon
whatsapp-icon Back to top