Back
BOMBAY HIGH COURT
NITIN W. SAMBRE, N. R. BORKAR, JJ
Ujwala Baban Wetam & Ors. – Appellant
Versus
The State of Maharashtra & Ors. – Respondent
| Table of Content |
|---|
| 1. filing and investigation processes of fir. (Para 6 , 7 , 10) |
| 2. arguments concerning the delay and continuation of proceedings. (Para 8 , 11) |
| 3. court's observation on expediting the process and actions required. (Para 12 , 13 , 14 , 15 , 16) |
| 4. directive for a timely decision by the magistrate. (Para 17) |
| 5. resolution and disposal of the petition. (Para 18) |
N. R. BORKAR, JJ DATED : 2nd NOVEMBER, 2023 P.C.:
WP/2948/2023 1. Detagged. WP/2862/2022
2. Mr. Udane, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioners brought to our notice the order dated 29/09/2023 and submitted that in the said order Writ Petition No. 2948 of 2023 be corrected to Writ Petition No. 2948 of 2022
3. In view of above, we deem it appropriate to correct the Writ Petition No. 2948 of 2023 to Writ Petition No. 2948 of 2022
4. OfÏce to produce the papers of WP/2948/2022 as directed in the said order dated 29/09/2023 on 07/11/2023
5. We have heard Mr. Udane, learned Counsel for the Petitioner, Mr. Patil, learned Counsel for the Respondent No. 5 and learned APP for the Respondent Nos. 1 to 4-State.
6. The prayer in the Petition is for quashing of the FIR in Crime No. 14 of 2014 punishable u/s. 386, 378, 341, 323,
An indispensable Tool for Legal Professionals, Endorsed by Various High Court and Judicial Officers
Please visit our Training & Support
Center or Contact Us for assistance
Scan Me!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
For Daily Legal Updates, Join us on :
Back to top
