BOMBAY HIGH COURT
Madhav J. Jamdar, J
Leena Lincen Thommana – Appellant
Versus
Lincen Louis Thommana – Respondent
CORAM: MADHAV J. JAMDAR, J.
DATED : 13th AUGUST 2025 PC:-
1. Mr. Vhatkar, learned Counsel appearing for the Petitioner and Ms. Ahuja, learned Counsel appearing for the Respondent No.1 state that the parties have settled the dispute and tendered the Consent Terms.
2. The Consent Terms are signed by the Petitioner/Wife- Leena Lincen Thommana and the Respondent/Husband-Lincen Louis Thommana. The Consent Terms are also signed by the respective Advocates. Respective Advocates have identified the signatures of the Petitioner and the Respondent.
3. The Petitioner/Wife- Leena Lincen Thommana and the Respondent/Husband-Lincen Louis Thommana are personally present in Court and they state that they have settled the dispute in terms of the Consent Terms.
4. Accordingly, the Consent Terms are taken on record and marked ‘X’ for identification. The said Consent Terms read as under:
“CONSENT TERMS
1. That the Petitioner and Respondent abovenamed are Wife and husband, have agreed to settle the all disputes and difference between them amicably.
2. That both the parties abovenamed, have agreed to dissolve their marriage by mutual consent under Section 10(A) of Indian Divorce Act, 1869 . In furtherance there
Login now and unlock free premium legal research
Login to SupremeToday AI and access free legal analysis, AI highlights, and smart tools.
Login
now!
India’s Legal research and Law Firm App, Download now!
Copyright © 2023 Vikas Info Solution Pvt Ltd. All Rights Reserved.